The OUN’s record during the Second World War is stained by horrific atrocities. The movement participated in campaigns of ethnic violence and mass murder, most notoriously during the massacres in Volhynia and Eastern Galicia, where tens of thousands of Polish civilians were brutally slaughtered. OUN and collaborators were also implicated in anti-Jewish violence during the Nazi occupation.

After World War II, Melnyk, like many other Nazi collaborators, managed to avoid prosecution for a combination of legal, and geopolitical reasons. He died and was buried in Luxemburg in 1964 at the age of 73.

This week, Melnyk’s remains were exhumed, flown to Kiev, and reburied in Ukraine’s National Cemetery with the treatment of a national hero, a decision that is grotesque and morally indefensible.

With the notable exception of Israel, no western country (if one can call Israel a Western country) officially condemned this disgraceful event. Even more disturbing was the reaction of major Western media outlets. The New York Times chose to describe Melnyk merely as a “divisive” figure. Divisive? That euphemism sanitizes a man tied to a movement associated with fascism, ethnic hatred, collaboration with Nazi Germany, and mass atrocities. Calling such a figure “divisive” is not journalism; it is moral cowardice.

One begins to wonder how far this whitewashing will go. At this rate, even Hitler himself may soon be reduced by “respectable” media to nothing more than a “controversial” or “polarizing” historical figure. Time to do something about that, don’t you think?