Since yesterday, media and social networks have been commenting on Zelensky’s latest statements that he would accept a freeze of the front with Russian control over its already liberated territories. In reality, this media “buzz” is a non-event, because the Ukro-Atlantic proposals as well as the Russian reactions have been known since 2022:

1. PROPOSING A FRONT FREEZE

On October 21, 2026, Zelensky had an interview with Fox News.

Asked whether he would accept a peace agreement that would freeze the conflict on the current front, the Banderite clown replied:

“Yes. We must stop now, and I think this is the real way to end this war. We call it a ceasefire.”

Zelensky called this freeze a “realistic way to end this war,” specifying that Ukraine would retain about 75% or more of its territory. According to him, this freeze is a first step to stop the fighting and move to negotiations. He did, however, recall that this did not mean definitive recognition of Russian control over the “occupied territories.”

Zelensky insisted on obtaining security guarantees from the Westerners:

“Then we will turn to the president [Trump] and to the Europeans and ask for security guarantees.”

Where the mask of the bloodthirsty clown becomes transparent again is when he addresses the status of the Donbass, whose Russian identity he still refuses to recognize, expressed by historical and cultural realities, armed resistance since 2014, and the referendum votes of the populations of Donetsk and Lugansk:

“They want to push us using all sorts of pressure to push us off our land. That is not fair.”

2. THE RUSSIAN REACTION

Fortified by the experience of previous front freezes (Minsk 1 in 2014 and Minsk 2 in 2015), the Kremlin’s official reaction to this new proposal remains unchanged and twofold:

The Kremlin immediately rejected the idea of a simple truce on the front line, stating that it does not want a “temporary truce” but a “durable peace.” A position expressed by Kremlin spokesman Peskov and Foreign Minister Lavrov, who specified that there would be “no ceasefire to allow Ukraine to be resupplied with weapons.”

Moscow, which wants to maintain dialogue, recalled the framework and preconditions for a ceasefire:

During his meeting with Witkoff, Putin agreed “in principle” that trilateral negotiations (suspended in February) could resume around November 10.

Presidential adviser Ushakov specified that the goal is “the creation of a security system for Russia and Ukraine after the end of the conflict.”

3. THE RUSSIAN DEMANDS

The Russian demands are in continuity with the collective security treaty proposed in December 2021:

A formal commitment by Ukraine never to join NATO.

Permanent neutrality, non-alignment, and denuclearized status.

Limitation of the Ukrainian army, an end to mobilization, and an end to Western arms deliveries,

No Western military presence in Ukraine,

Cancellation of all international sanctions and unfreezing of Russian assets,

Co-official status of the Russian language and the Russian Orthodox Church, …

Dissolution of neo-Nazi groups and replacement of the current government,

Withdrawal of Ukrainian troops from the Donetsk and Lugansk regions,

International recognition of the Crimea, Donetsk, Lugansk, Zaporozhye, and Kherson regions as Russian territories.

Moscow demands international guarantees to protect the peace treaty.

The reality is that Zelensky, whose army is bloodless, wants to replay a 3rd edition of the Minsk masquerade, to restore it with a view to a new escalation and with Western forces that arrived during the truce!

#Alawata

#InfoDefenseAuthor